Controversial…
April 29th, 2009
Michael O’Leary may not be the model of CEO some in the airline industry aspire to be - whether its his outspoken views on the European Union or the recent “fat tax” furore, the one thing that makes him stand out from the crowd is his ability to grab headlines without being an “in your face” camera addict like other airlines bosses - namely the fellow who runs a certain brand that has which has not been “de-flowered“.
O’Leary’s comments on “slumdwellers” being the only folk likely to contract the new fever originating in Mexico has also raised a chorus of critics, but unlike Branson, O’Leary’s acumen for causing a stir is nothing short of a hilarious class act, even if his points veer tragically off the mark.
(For those Brit readers or those that understand Brit humour, you’ll know what I am getting at! And no, thats NOT a dig at those who do not “get it” either!)

Image courtesy of Boeing
“O’Leary’s too smart to know that this type of slum-dweller comment is just plain stupid. It won’t come back to haunt him because nothing ever does (one of Ryanair’s credos is, basically, “We don’t care, we just get you there”). And that’s actually to be applauded - O’Leary operates a great business model and sure, his airline’s no luxury experience, but if you want an easy life in aerospace plus 13 paychecks a year, go join Airbus.
It’s increasingly likely O’Leary is just restless and is looking for one more big business venture. He’s talked both about retirement and about long-haul low-cost operations and wisely backed away from the latter idea since there is no viable business model for this type of airline, never has been and never will be. Hybrids don’t really interest him either — with O’Leary it’s all or nothing,” says Arran Aerospace’s Doug McVitie.
Just over a month ago, the Times of London ran a bizarre piece on the “20 reasons not to fly Ryanair“.
Well, I’ll give you 20 why the Times was wrong. An all counts.
1. 1p flights are never 1p
Well, d’uh! With one of the highest levels of airport duties emanating from the UK, every Ryanair customer knows its an advertising gimmick and that taxes are NOT included. Any idiot could tell you a 1p flight NEVER translates into a 1p flight. Unless perhaps you’re an idiot?
2. The check in charge
Well, perhaps its a “sly” charge, but I’d like the Times to explain why Ryanair customers are STILL happy to pay it. It wont be long before other carriers follow suit, it’s an innovative way of creating extra revenue.
3. The baggage charge
And? Most airlines today charge a fee of sorts for checked baggage. During the oil price spike of $147 last year, many a carrier lobbed on fees for first and second bags checked in. Ryanair isn’t exactly doing anything “out of the ordinary” here.
4. The sneaky weight limit
Right, so Ryanair has a weight issue with bags - so does British Airways but I don’t see the outrage? As for the Times claiming that “it makes not a jot of difference to the weight of the aeroplane” - well, actually yes it does. More bags equals more weight equals more fuel burn equals more cost.
5. Queues glorious queues
Remember the disaster of Terminal 5 opening? People getting on airplanes has always caused queues, is this a new phenomenon only just discovered by the Times? Ryanair is as “guilty” as every other airline in this respect.
6. The additional baggage charge
Refer to point #3.
7. The website is rubbish. On purpose.
…yet millions still use it to book flights, despite knowing the other six reasons above. In fact, Ryanair’s site may not be pleasant to look at, but its far easier to navigate than the likes of other carriers (no naming and shaming here.)
8. Premium rate internet helpline
http://www.saynoto0870.com/companysearch.php
9. You can only fly cheap mid week
Every airline has offers with strings attached. This is nothing new and certainly not a valid reason not to fly with Ryanair.
10. You have to travel at obscene hours.
But passengers still DO! What does that tell the Times (or any other critic)?

Image courtesy of Heathcliff O’Malley
11. The destination airports are in the middle of nowhere.
…hence the lower fares than full service airlines. Granted, catching a cab from Frankfurt-Hahn to the centre of the city may cost more Euro’s than you spent on your flight, but then refer to point #10.
12. A bottle of water on board costs £3
So what? It cost me double that in Harrods no more than a week ago, and I didn’t even fly anywhere. If you don’t want to pay £3 for water, airside shops will probably sell it cheaper anyway. If you’re smart enough to buy a bargain flight, buying cheap water should be a breeze…
13. Sweaty, plasticky seats
Even on full service carriers, the seats can be awful, yet people continue to fly. This is just an example of preference and not a reason to avoid flying the Irish carrier.
14. The in-flight musak
…and does this play throughout the flight? No? NEXT!
15. The fanfare
Oh, so it’s okay when Sir Brannie does it, but because we have an Irish airline that likes to celebrate it’s suddenly not acceptable! C’mon!
16. You can’t book a seat
Neither could you before the internet came along. Off to the check-in desk and you got whatever was left. People didn’t complain then, and I doubt they’re doing it now (unless you’re part of the Times…)
17. No refunds, ever
…and did you read the smallprint?
18. Poor compensation
What would you have them give you? Suggestions welcome.
19. You are always being flogged stuff
…as you are on when on terra-firma. Is there a point to this?
20. Michael O’Leary himself
Between O’Leary and say, Branson - I know who I’d share a pint with, and it wouldn’t be the Englishman.
Controversial? Absolutely!
Entry Filed under: Arran Aerospace, Boeing, Boeing 737-800, Boeing 737NG, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Doug McVitie, Michael O'Leary, Ryanair
13 Comments Add your own
1. Aurora | April 29th, 2009 at 21:24
Will it not be fun to see MOL square off with the unionized workforce at Aer Lingus if/when he gets his hands on that airline?
2. Paula K | April 29th, 2009 at 23:47
Will MOL now try and seize Air Lingus now that Mannion is gone?
3. boeing investor | April 30th, 2009 at 10:10
Very poor reasoning from the Times.
4. Ed | April 30th, 2009 at 15:54
Could the Times be a little racist here (British published “newspaper” talking about the Irish)?
Their story is no different than you can find in the BBC, NY Times, Washington Post, or LA Times………rubbish.
But, all of them are useful…..for lining the bottom of bird cages and kitty litter boxes.
5. B380 | April 30th, 2009 at 17:37
“if you want an easy life in aerospace plus 13 paychecks a year, go join Airbus” — Dougie never misses an opportunity… It’s getting pathetic, he seems to have stopped caring if he is talking complete nonsense.
Back to the topic. I flew on FR. It got me to my destination and back, exactly what I wanted. If people want first class service, they should contact a different airline. As for MOL, he is a big mouth, who will keep his airline in the headlines. That’s part of his job I guess.
6. ikkeman | April 30th, 2009 at 19:02
“Well, I’ll give you 20 why the Times was wrong. An all counts”
so where were they wrong?
You may not agree, or you may ridicule - because the times does not accept the degrading treatment which is the only thing you get free at Ryan and you do accept this insult (don’t get me wrong, I book the cheapest flight anywhere also, but their opinion of their customers will never let you feel ” always right”)
But where were they wrong??
7. MPTA-098 | April 30th, 2009 at 21:07
B380, when I looked again at some of what was said at the time the 747-8I/F was launched, this gem of a quote (not!) by Dougie popped up seemingly from nowhere in this link:
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?D=2005-11-15&ID=135107
“This means a really bad year for Airbus just got much worse,” said Doug McVitie, managing director of Arran Aerospace, an aerospace consulting company in Dinan, France. “For Boeing to be able to say they’re going to have 20 per cent better economics than the A380 means Boeing is taking the high ground.”
BTW, that’s a good response of yours, over in the other thread, to that question of wing bending relief.
8. Paula K | April 30th, 2009 at 21:30
“so where were they wrong?”
Brit humour is not always understood by non-Brits. Thats not a swipe at you ikkeman, rather the difference in approach to critique etc.
The answers to “where were they wrong” has indeed be highlighted by the writer. I actually agree with him too, the Times reasons not to fly were there own opinions that dont take into account the actions of other airlines. Maybe the Times is racist
9. B380 | April 30th, 2009 at 21:48
MPTA-098, it seems Dougie has a vendetta of some sort against Airbus. In an article which has nothing to do with Airbus at all, he still manages to have a pop at them! According to him, Boeing can do no wrong and Airbus does everything wrong. Even Dickie is not that militant. But that’s a whole different topic.
10. MPTA-098 | April 30th, 2009 at 22:15
B380, there seems to be little or no humor in Doug. At least Dick’s got some memorable one liners to show for.
11. Paula K | April 30th, 2009 at 23:40
Thats a problem with Americans - like politics, they dont have any knack for English humour!
12. ikkeman | May 1st, 2009 at 10:29
should this pro-ryanair diatribe by Mr McVitie be in anyway connected to the 187 738’s they operate or the 200 a/c, 7BUSD order thats in the supposed to be coming up?
13. Jacobin777 | May 1st, 2009 at 13:58
The article will probably only help FR….:-p
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed