<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental Interior Firms Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: antonio</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-4034</link>
		<dc:creator>antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-4034</guid>
		<description>i love my boeing 747 400.800.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love my boeing 747 400.800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FleetBuzz Editorial.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>FleetBuzz Editorial.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-434</guid>
		<description>...will update soon, been busy with other stuff :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;will update soon, been busy with other stuff <img src='http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falcon</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Falcon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Isn't there any good Boeing news or bad Airbus news so this blog can see some updates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there any good Boeing news or bad Airbus news so this blog can see some updates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikkeman</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>ikkeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-416</guid>
		<description>isn't the revised schedule on track by definition...

Oh no, there's the short time between the admittance of a schedule slip and the implementation of a schedule revision...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isn&#8217;t the revised schedule on track by definition&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh no, there&#8217;s the short time between the admittance of a schedule slip and the implementation of a schedule revision&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-415</guid>
		<description>ikkeman - I think/guess that Ed was referring to that revised schedule being on track rather than the previous one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ikkeman - I think/guess that Ed was referring to that revised schedule being on track rather than the previous one <img src='http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikkeman</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>ikkeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Ed  &#124;  March 24th, 2009 at 5:45 pm

I do believe their schedule already slipped from H2 2010 to Q2 2011</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed  |  March 24th, 2009 at 5:45 pm</p>
<p>I do believe their schedule already slipped from H2 2010 to Q2 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-413</guid>
		<description>QF/SQ have ruled out the 747-8I too many times to recall.

Howver, the 747-8F (or 77f) would make very good sense at SQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QF/SQ have ruled out the 747-8I too many times to recall.</p>
<p>Howver, the 747-8F (or 77f) would make very good sense at SQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-412</guid>
		<description>I am happy to see the B-747-8F and -8I programs are still on schedule.  I believe there are some 28 orders for the B-747-8I, 20 for LH and 8 for the BBJ program.

LH still holds 20 more B-747-8I options, and have until 2013 to exercise them.  

Currently, I believe there are some 105 total orders for the B-747-8, 28 for the "I" and 77 for the "F".  The B-747-8F/I program has sold about half of the total sales of the A-380-800, in 1/3 of the program time (3 years vs. 12 years).  Keesje is not going to be happy.

With a possible future USAF order of 3 B-747-8Is to replace the current 2 VC-25As, and another 12-24 B-747-8Fs for the AL-1A program Including replacing the current YAL-1A prototype, a B-747-400F model). this program is beginning to take shape.

Additional future orders would come from current B-747-400/F/ER/ERF operators, including NH, JL, UA, DL (NW), BA, AF, QF, NZ, SQ, CX, UPS, LH, as well as others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy to see the B-747-8F and -8I programs are still on schedule.  I believe there are some 28 orders for the B-747-8I, 20 for LH and 8 for the BBJ program.</p>
<p>LH still holds 20 more B-747-8I options, and have until 2013 to exercise them.  </p>
<p>Currently, I believe there are some 105 total orders for the B-747-8, 28 for the &#8220;I&#8221; and 77 for the &#8220;F&#8221;.  The B-747-8F/I program has sold about half of the total sales of the A-380-800, in 1/3 of the program time (3 years vs. 12 years).  Keesje is not going to be happy.</p>
<p>With a possible future USAF order of 3 B-747-8Is to replace the current 2 VC-25As, and another 12-24 B-747-8Fs for the AL-1A program Including replacing the current YAL-1A prototype, a B-747-400F model). this program is beginning to take shape.</p>
<p>Additional future orders would come from current B-747-400/F/ER/ERF operators, including NH, JL, UA, DL (NW), BA, AF, QF, NZ, SQ, CX, UPS, LH, as well as others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 04:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-411</guid>
		<description>"Wait for Keesje - he’ll cancel it in one fell swoop as he did with the 787-3."

Lol..that was my first thought as well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wait for Keesje - he’ll cancel it in one fell swoop as he did with the 787-3.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lol..that was my first thought as well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2009/03/23/747-8i/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=317#comment-408</guid>
		<description>"I sure hope this is a non cancellable vaildation of the order."

Wait for Keesje - he'll cancel it in one fell swoop as he did with the 787-3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I sure hope this is a non cancellable vaildation of the order.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait for Keesje - he&#8217;ll cancel it in one fell swoop as he did with the 787-3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
