<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Airways Selects 777-300ER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>This is a cool site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a cool site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Boeing's order update this week shows BA has ordered 2 77Ws. So the "rumours" that they were leasing the remaining 4 from GECAS seems to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boeing&#8217;s order update this week shows BA has ordered 2 77Ws. So the &#8220;rumours&#8221; that they were leasing the remaining 4 from GECAS seems to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>What's interesting is according to this ATWonline news, Boeing might have a B777 replacement between 2020-2025....that would be only a few years between BA 
would be able get A350-1000 slots (unless Airbus have a few reserved, which they might)....

I think if Boeing can improve the operational numbers of the B77W, offer BA some good prices and get to work on the B777 replacement, BA could certainly order more B77W's and wait for a potential "Y3"....IMHO of course.

http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=13555</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s interesting is according to this ATWonline news, Boeing might have a B777 replacement between 2020-2025&#8230;.that would be only a few years between BA<br />
would be able get A350-1000 slots (unless Airbus have a few reserved, which they might)&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think if Boeing can improve the operational numbers of the B77W, offer BA some good prices and get to work on the B777 replacement, BA could certainly order more B77W&#8217;s and wait for a potential &#8220;Y3&#8243;&#8230;.IMHO of course.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=13555" rel="nofollow">http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=13555</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1491</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1491</guid>
		<description>"The real mistake is to starve a highly successful program that is behind schedule to feed a sick old dog no one wants."

Hm, sounds just the recipe for the A380 as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The real mistake is to starve a highly successful program that is behind schedule to feed a sick old dog no one wants.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hm, sounds just the recipe for the A380 as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1483</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1483</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Surely one would surmise that locking in an A350-1000 order sooner rather than later would ensure good delivery positions? &lt;/b&gt;

Who's to say they haven't already (if they've made their long-term decision)?

You'll be seeing another major airline lining up A350 delivery positions very shortly. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Surely one would surmise that locking in an A350-1000 order sooner rather than later would ensure good delivery positions? </b></p>
<p>Who&#8217;s to say they haven&#8217;t already (if they&#8217;ve made their long-term decision)?</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll be seeing another major airline lining up A350 delivery positions very shortly. <img src='http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOEING777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>BOEING777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>Surely one would surmise that locking in an A350-1000 order sooner rather than later would ensure good delivery positions? 

The A350 is pretty much sold out through 2017, 2 years after the targeted EIS of the -1000.

(Pre-emptive measure rather than reactive, vis a vis the 77W order? :-) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely one would surmise that locking in an A350-1000 order sooner rather than later would ensure good delivery positions? </p>
<p>The A350 is pretty much sold out through 2017, 2 years after the targeted EIS of the -1000.</p>
<p>(Pre-emptive measure rather than reactive, vis a vis the 77W order? <img src='http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/ba777order/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/08/01/british-airways-selects-777-300er/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Surprising is the absence of reference to any potential order for the A350-1000&lt;/b&gt;

Why is it surprising? The -1000 is being considered by BA as part of their major relacement RFP. This lease/buy deal for 77Ws is a tactical order. What will be decided later this year is the strategic decision. Don't confuse the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Surprising is the absence of reference to any potential order for the A350-1000</b></p>
<p>Why is it surprising? The -1000 is being considered by BA as part of their major relacement RFP. This lease/buy deal for 77Ws is a tactical order. What will be decided later this year is the strategic decision. Don&#8217;t confuse the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
