<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: British Airways Flirts With Big Boeing Twin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/comment-page-1/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Supposedly a leasing company holding 12 77W leases just lost their customer, which is why BA is now looking with interest to the plane.

As Jacobin777 noted, a 77W carries more payload and burns less fuel then a 747-400 and flies the same distance. It carries less passengers, but BA can just shrink the WT which will improve the RASM that cabin generates.

I still believe BA will order the A350-1000 (and only the A350-1000) at the UK Air Show. BA could take these 12 77Ws on lease for a decade to hold them over until the A350-1000's are available, enjoying the benefits they offer and allowing them to replace their 12 oldest 744s now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supposedly a leasing company holding 12 77W leases just lost their customer, which is why BA is now looking with interest to the plane.</p>
<p>As Jacobin777 noted, a 77W carries more payload and burns less fuel then a 747-400 and flies the same distance. It carries less passengers, but BA can just shrink the WT which will improve the RASM that cabin generates.</p>
<p>I still believe BA will order the A350-1000 (and only the A350-1000) at the UK Air Show. BA could take these 12 77Ws on lease for a decade to hold them over until the A350-1000&#8217;s are available, enjoying the benefits they offer and allowing them to replace their 12 oldest 744s now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris C</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/comment-page-1/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Very well written, logical and clear article.
It would certainly seem that British Airways will opt for the 777-300ER. Apart from the stellar operating economics, performance capabilities, fuel-efficiencies and design, Boeing has vowed that the -300ER and -200LR will receive enhancements. Boeing have said that through the GE90 engine improvements (using knowledge from the GEnx), as well as fine tuning aerodynamic lines further, that a -300ER will be able to close the fuel-efficiency gap to the A350-1000, but nowhere near better it, but match the promised seat/mile costs of the A350-1000. 

Why not opt for 777-300ER now, with the possibility of having it being an enhanced model, reap the significant rewards the formidable airplane will generate, and by the time the A350-1000 comes about, Boeing should have launched the 777/747-8 replacement. That way, you're able to leap-frog the A350. Seems logical to me. 

It's a pity that BA did not opt for the 747-8I, but nevertheless, an A380 fleet complimented with a 777-300ER, perhaps even -200LR as well, seems to be a really logical move for BA now. 

...Did I just hear someone say "787-10" is on the table as well? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well written, logical and clear article.<br />
It would certainly seem that British Airways will opt for the 777-300ER. Apart from the stellar operating economics, performance capabilities, fuel-efficiencies and design, Boeing has vowed that the -300ER and -200LR will receive enhancements. Boeing have said that through the GE90 engine improvements (using knowledge from the GEnx), as well as fine tuning aerodynamic lines further, that a -300ER will be able to close the fuel-efficiency gap to the A350-1000, but nowhere near better it, but match the promised seat/mile costs of the A350-1000. </p>
<p>Why not opt for 777-300ER now, with the possibility of having it being an enhanced model, reap the significant rewards the formidable airplane will generate, and by the time the A350-1000 comes about, Boeing should have launched the 777/747-8 replacement. That way, you&#8217;re able to leap-frog the A350. Seems logical to me. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pity that BA did not opt for the 747-8I, but nevertheless, an A380 fleet complimented with a 777-300ER, perhaps even -200LR as well, seems to be a really logical move for BA now. </p>
<p>&#8230;Did I just hear someone say &#8220;787-10&#8243; is on the table as well? <img src='http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/16/british-airways-flirts-with-big-boeing-twin/#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Given all of the rumours surrounding BA and the B773ER, I think there is a good shot at BA getting the B773ER. It would fit perfectly as B744 replacement. It would allow BA to keep their 4-class setup and reduce lower RASM economy seats. 

Also, it will allow them to carry more cargo over the B744's.

The A350-1000 has basically only a couple of customers...BA will certainly wait it out..even until 2020 if they have to. 

By then, one would assume Boeing might have a B773ER/B748I replacement. 

I could see BA operation 20 A380's and 20-30 B773ER's to replace their B744's. It doesn't have to be "1:1" replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given all of the rumours surrounding BA and the B773ER, I think there is a good shot at BA getting the B773ER. It would fit perfectly as B744 replacement. It would allow BA to keep their 4-class setup and reduce lower RASM economy seats. </p>
<p>Also, it will allow them to carry more cargo over the B744&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The A350-1000 has basically only a couple of customers&#8230;BA will certainly wait it out..even until 2020 if they have to. </p>
<p>By then, one would assume Boeing might have a B773ER/B748I replacement. </p>
<p>I could see BA operation 20 A380&#8217;s and 20-30 B773ER&#8217;s to replace their B744&#8217;s. It doesn&#8217;t have to be &#8220;1:1&#8243; replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
