<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Powering The 787 Dreamliner To Power On</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacobin777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacobin777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>While Boeing still have a difficult road in front of them, congrats to Boeing, Vought, etc. getting this far. 

Lets hope rest of the B787 schedule goes smoothly.

I do agree with [i]Chris Wallace[/i] in that I wouldn't be surprised to see Boeing develop the B789/B78-10 concurrently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Boeing still have a difficult road in front of them, congrats to Boeing, Vought, etc. getting this far. </p>
<p>Lets hope rest of the B787 schedule goes smoothly.</p>
<p>I do agree with [i]Chris Wallace[/i] in that I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see Boeing develop the B789/B78-10 concurrently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>I would not be surprised if Boeing doesn't work on a parallel development path for the 787-9 and 787-10 since they're pushing the 787-9's EIS back. The 787-10, while not a true 777-200ER/A350-900 competitor in terms of range, will offer more passenger and cargo volume then either plane. As such, it could become a very popular TATL and Asia/Oceania regional plane, replacing A330-300s, 777-200s and 777-300s currently flying those missions (which is a current market of some 600+ planes).

Airbus is evidently shopping a lighter-MEW version of the entire A350 family for such "regional" missions, so they too must see a market and don't want the 787-10 to take it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not be surprised if Boeing doesn&#8217;t work on a parallel development path for the 787-9 and 787-10 since they&#8217;re pushing the 787-9&#8217;s EIS back. The 787-10, while not a true 777-200ER/A350-900 competitor in terms of range, will offer more passenger and cargo volume then either plane. As such, it could become a very popular TATL and Asia/Oceania regional plane, replacing A330-300s, 777-200s and 777-300s currently flying those missions (which is a current market of some 600+ planes).</p>
<p>Airbus is evidently shopping a lighter-MEW version of the entire A350 family for such &#8220;regional&#8221; missions, so they too must see a market and don&#8217;t want the 787-10 to take it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/06/13/powering-the-787-dreamliner-to-power-on/#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Its a given that the 787-9 will end up late in that deliveries for the better selling 787-8 will be a priority for Boeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a given that the 787-9 will end up late in that deliveries for the better selling 787-8 will be a priority for Boeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
