Boeing 787 Encounters Second Major Delay

January 16th, 2008

Further to the exclusive news revealed early last week that the Boeing 787 Dreamliner power on remained elusive, an article published by the Wall Street Journal stated that the airplane would be delayed again means that Boeing now has an opportunity to impress both stockholders and its customers despite the setback.

With over 800 firm orders and a previously ambitious target of building 109 airplanes by the end of 2009, the realization that the first 787 is taking longer to assemble points to one critical element.

At the December 2007 media briefing, 787 Program Manager Patrick Shanahan had stated that design work on the airplane was complete. From what is already known, the technical aspects of the Dreamliner are not in question, rather the expertise and knowledge from the various suppliers and partners on the program is what has ultimately held back first flight from taking place.

One may argue that the new delay announced by Boeing was not a great a surprise as previously thought and is unlikely to erode the stock in the long term - the 787 has no direct rival and the overwhelming majority of customers still see value in the airplane and have not shied away from continually ordering more.

Boeing 787-8

All images courtesy of Boeing

Delaying the 787 until 2009 will be of little comfort to those who had anticipated seeing service entry later this year, but the move will allow for a greater scope of testing in the event any anomalies arise and will further strengthen the position of the 777-200F which enters final assembly later this month and the 747-8F - both of which were derided by misguided comments that the 787 program would eat their resources and delay these jets too.

Elements of the first 787 did not arrive with the pre-stuffed wiring and other components - in effect, since the July 8, 2007 Premiere, Boeing has had to “reverse engineer” the first airplane to reduce the traveled work in order to both complete installations in readiness for power on status and first flight.

Below is a summary of some of the key points raised in the January 16, 2008 conference call:

BCA President & CEO Scott Carson (SC)

  • First flight will occur by end of second quarter 2008, enter service early 2009
  • “Disappointed” with delay, right decision for success of program, customers understand
  • New plan is credible & achievable
  • Product validated – confidence has increased – breakthrough technology for customers and public
  • Fastener issue coming down on Airplane #1, parts shortages lower, more work in sequence
  • Traveled work taking longer to work through
  • Assessment underway of what needs to be done & timescale involved
  • Decreased travel work on subsequent airplanes
  • “Committed to deliver as promised”
  • Credibility being tested
  • Will not reach target of 109 airplanes by end of 2009
  • Will be in position to understand financial impact on partners in several weeks
  • “We will pass this test”

Boeing 787 Program Manager Patrick Shanahan (PS)

  • Underestimated time required to complete others (suppliers) work
  • Everett set up for large scale last stage integration
  • Several thousand system components required for first flight
  • 27 system components required for power on to be achieved
  • 20 system components required to commence taxi tests
  • 75% system components for power on verified in lab tests
  • Fastener shortage/replacement “down to hundreds” on Airplane #1
  • Not been able to complete assembly work
  • Matching product parts & processes “onerous & time consuming”
  • Not a lot of margin in original plan – confident in executing new plan
  • Power on by start of second quarter (circa April 1 2008)
  • On track to demonstrate certification requirements with FAA
  • October plan based on analysis – new plane based on experience over last 3 months
  • Wiring bundles done
  • More time to test/validate bundle functionality
  • Parametrically consistent at this stage with past airplane programs
  • Striking right balance, creating increased program fidelity
  • Airplane #1 will be first to fly

This second delay may well be considered a blessing in disguise for the company and for launch customer, All Nippon Airways.

For Boeing, getting this revolutionary airplane right is far more significant than getting into a customers hands. Finding new problems later on and addressing these if they didn’t crop up during the flight test program is something the company will seek to avoid.

Airbus’ flagship A380 that was delayed for almost two years is now seen as a more mature product since entering service in October 2007. Aside from the unfortunate mishap the first model encountered last week, Singapore Airlines has since taken delivery of its second machine. Despatch reliability for the A380 had been running at 100% prior to the accident caused by a tug.

Likewise, Boeing can emulate and replicate that service entry success with the 787 if time is taken to ensure the airplane is as trouble-free as it can possibly be.

It’s no easy feat but neither is it insurmountable. For All Nippon Airways, news that the Trent 1000 engine is missing its fuel burn target to the tune of some 3% according to some industry sources, Rolls Royce will equally have an extended window in which it can address these issues.

As noted in the piece last week, stretching out and opening up the flight test program to enable service entry towards April 2009 will allow for critical cold weather soak tests to be conducted.

It was noted previously that Boeing would not be conducting full scale evacuation tests - instead empirical evacuation data from the 777 and 767 would have been used to assess passenger movement between aisles to calculate a projected full cabin exit time.

As noted by Patrick Shanahan in the conference call, agreement has already been reached with the FAA on certification requirements and evacuation tests will not be required.

This new delay will in the short term hit hard on Boeing’s stock price and will lead to further analyst pessimism and penalty payments to customers who will not now get their hands on their 787’s till much later than planned.

Boeing 787-8

In the longer term, the outlook for the company remains bright. The marketplaces’ acceptance of the revolutionary benefits that the 787 brings has not stifled orders for the airplane. Only last week, Gulf Air announced it would be ordering 16 787-8’s, Thai Airways too has selected the jet ahead of the competing Airbus A350XWB to replace is ageing A300’s and A330’s and Fijian airline Air Pacific increased it’s 787-9 commitments.

The logistical supplier network that is the 787 lifeline continues to evolve - in aiming for the target of final assembly to just under four days, the experience of being able to assemble prefabricated components has come at a high price for Boeing.

One may argue that where there is risk, there is also reward.

After 2007 sales between both Airbus and Boeing totalling over 2,700 airplanes, an industry slowdown may just be the hidden gem for the 787.

Arriving post-2009 allows airlines to better adjust their fleets towards replacing older widebodies more progressively and build up flight experience with the world’s first largely composite airplane.

Morgan Stanley’s analyst Heidi Wood states that “a (787) delay may be on the margins more tolerable than … when the market was roaring.”

That honest assessment will go a great distance in restoring confidence in Boeing’s ability to state and execute it’s desired goals on the project. While hindsight is a useful instrument to backtrack and avoid hiccups in the future, it may have been more prudent for Boeing to have announced a 12 month delay back in October 2007.

A bitter pill it may have been to swallow, but digesting piecemeal news of setbacks is likely to be viewed with much more negativity.

According to one anonymous email received, flightdeck installation is several weeks away, meaning power on will not realistically be achieved until the first week of April 2008 as stated by Shanahan.

According to BCA President and CEO, Scott Carson, the 787 Dreamliner is the right airplane for the marketplace.

The fundamental design and technologies of the 787 remain sound“.

However, we continue to be challenged by startup issues in our factory and in our extended global supply chain.

The impressive order book for the type is testimony to that - making that concept turn into a reality for the skies above us, a cohesive and integrated supply chain adjustment needs to be made as quickly as possible if the 787 is to avoid any further impediment.

Rather than focus on the setbacks, the key point is the one stressed by Carson -

We will pass this test“.

Sphere: Related Content

Entry Filed under: 787 First Flight, 787 Orders, 787 Premiere, 787 Rollout, Aeroplane, Aerospace, Air Transport, Air Travel, Airbus, Airlines, Airplane, Airplane Order, Airplanes, Airport, Airports, Boeing, Boeing 787, Boeing 787 Order, Boeing 787 Orders, Boeing 787 Premiere, Boeing 787 Rollout, Boeing Orders, Dreamliner, Dreamliner First Flight, FleetBuzz.com, Jet Travel, Randy Tinseth, Richard Aboulafia, Travel

12 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Jacobin777  |  January 16th, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    ..Boeing stock is up more than 2.5% and is the 2nd best points-wise) on the Dow Jones Industrials.

    …the main point of Carson’s talk…”NOTHING wrong in the technologies”….its just a matter of getting everything together…the plane will be as good, if not better than promised.

  • 2. Chris Wallace  |  January 16th, 2008 at 7:22 pm

    Disappointing, but I feel better that the core problem is because Boeing did not plan to build the first birds at PAE and has had to completely change it’s assembly plans and procedures.

    I am also buoyed that the design and structures themselves are sound and testing to specification.

    So it really is just a matter of getting the assembly process nailed down. And once that is done, Boeing will be able to crank them out and start to catch-up on the backlog.

    So I don’t see any cancellations. Hopefully, Boeing will be able to improve 737 and 777 sales as an incentive, but if not, the penalties are hardly ruinous (especially with the billions Boeing is bringing in every quarter even without any 787 deliveries) and they only bind the customer that much harder to their deals.

  • 3. Oldbus driver  |  January 16th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Does anybody know what the delivery sequence to individual airlines is?I am particularly interested in deliveries to UK operators and whether they will be part of the first year’s deliveries.

  • 4. Boeing Investor  |  January 16th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    It’s a shame to see further delays, but if it leads to a better airplane on entry into commercial flight, then it will have been worth the wait.

    Stock seems to have done well thus far today too - no major sell off.

  • 5. Cindy J.  |  January 17th, 2008 at 11:42 am

    There are very serious technical problems that no one dares mention to the guys at the top, like Carson. They will show up and keep this program stalled for a very long time. Much of the technology is NOT mature enough to use in a production aircraft.
    The roadside is littered with “revolutionary” approaches that failed. Technology requires maturity, a lesson Boeing never seems to learn. No one on earth can predict where this program will all end up, especially Boeing.

  • 6. Sal (USAF336TFS)  |  January 17th, 2008 at 2:53 pm

    These last few admissions only strengthen my sense that the amount of work Boeing chose to outsource to the partners when the 787 program was envisioned was way to aggressive.
    There is no doubt that the aircraft itself is a sound design. It’s equally apparent that when she does fly, she’ll dramatically change the commercial airline industry itself, much more then her overgrown, bloated, overweight competition.
    Boeing MUST, in my view, change fundamentally the production process of this aircraft. It must seriously consider either buying Vought, and/or Alenia or at the very least assume direct control of Global Aeronautica.
    With the sheer backlog of the 787, a second production line is no longer a “if” but more of a “when” question.
    And that line has to have more Boeing employees on it.

  • 7. Chris Wallace  |  January 17th, 2008 at 6:16 pm

    > These last few admissions only strengthen
    > my sense that the amount of work Boeing
    > chose to outsource to the partners when the
    > 787 program was envisioned was way to aggressive.

    And yet the 767 is even more outsourced (by percentage) then the 787, and it launched and ramped-up with little serious issues. The 747 and 777 also have not-insignificant levels of outsourcing.

    Boeing is trying to build airplanes the Airbus way - in large, pre-fabricated sections that can quickly be assembled by a handful of machinists at the factory. It is one of the reasons they will soon shove 40 A320s and 10 A330s/A340s out the door every month.

    Boeing and their suppliers underestimated how hard it was to do that and now Boeing has had to go back and assemble ZA001 “the old fashioned way” - from the outside-in starting with an empty shell. And the 787 production line at PAE was not set-up to build planes that way, so now they’re trying to do it without the jigs and stands that you see on the other widebody lines.

    Once the suppliers are up to speed (and some shipsets are now in the teens) they will deliver the parts properly pre-fabbed and Boeing will be able to assemble them at the planned rate.

  • 8. Aurora  |  January 18th, 2008 at 1:18 am

    Cindy J says:
    “There are very serious technical problems that no one dares mention to the guys at the top, like Carson.”

    Please tell us what these “serious technical problems” are.

  • 9. keesje  |  January 20th, 2008 at 12:43 am

    “the main point of Carson’s talk…”NOTHING wrong in the technologies”….its just a matter of getting everything together”

    “I am also buoyed that the design and structures themselves are sound and testing to specification.”

    I´m a bit carefulll to consider the new technology and its certification as a done deal because Carson says so.

    I think everybody should not be overly optimistic again.
    .

  • 10. Confidence/Credibility &l&hellip  |  January 21st, 2008 at 10:23 am

    [...] as Boeing experiences a difficult time getting the 787 program on track and aims to revive the sales of the 747-8I – Airbus too will focus 2008 on various key [...]

  • 11. Spanish Join The Dreamlin&hellip  |  January 23rd, 2008 at 7:19 am

    [...] news of the second delay to service entry of the 787 still being digested, Scott Carson rightly notes that the airplane’s breakthrough technology [...]

  • 12. Gunning For Orders - 747-&hellip  |  February 4th, 2008 at 7:34 am

    [...] course, it will not be until the 787 Dreamliner is underway with flight-testing with the GEnx that Boeing will be able to have even more concrete data about the performance of the [...]

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

January 2008
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Subscribe Here For Updates

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Recent Posts

RSS Active FleetBuzz.com Discussions

Recent Comments

RSS Randy's Journal

Blogroll

Category Cloud

Boeing Airlines Air Travel Air Transport Boeing 787 Aerospace Aviation Airbus Airplane Airplane Order Airplanes Airport Boeing 777 Airports Dreamliner Boeing Orders Boeing 747-8 Aeroplane FleetBuzz.com Airbus A350 Airbus A380 Jet Travel Travel Boeing 787 Orders Boeing 787 Premiere Boeing 787 Order Boeing 787 Rollout British Airways 787 Premiere 787 Orders 787 Rollout Emirates EADS Airbus A320 Low Cost Airlines Low Cost Carriers Dreamliner First Flight 787 First Flight Open Skies Fleet Replacement Airbus A319 Airbus A321 Airbus A318

Archives

YouTalk

YouTalk is a new feature to the Editorial. It's your chance to write an article and discuss it with the readership. If you are a registered member on FleetBuzz.com and you would like to submit an article for publication, please send to the following: admin@fleetbuzzeditorial.com

RSS Feed

Audio


FleetBuzz Editorial

↑ Grab this Headline Animator