<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSkies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Advantage: BA &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>Advantage: BA &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=184#comment-678</guid>
		<description>[...] news in early January 2008 that the carrier was to press ahead with its own new premuim off-shoot, OpenSkies to the recent Boeing 777-200ER crash landing to the countdown to the big move over to Terminal 5 - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news in early January 2008 that the carrier was to press ahead with its own new premuim off-shoot, OpenSkies to the recent Boeing 777-200ER crash landing to the countdown to the big move over to Terminal 5 - [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=184#comment-681</guid>
		<description>While the lack of Seventh Freedom rights will prevent SQ from running a JFK-LHR-JFK service, they could now launch JFK-LHR-SIN(-SYD)-return services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the lack of Seventh Freedom rights will prevent SQ from running a JFK-LHR-JFK service, they could now launch JFK-LHR-SIN(-SYD)-return services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Openskies?</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Openskies?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=184#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Odd that Brussels was selected. Theres not that much in the way of transatlantic demand for that route from the USA anyway.

Geneva would have been a better option. I wonder if AF-KLM use AZ as their open skies pet project in response?

Lufthansa seems to be the red herring here - a move for Bishops bmi perhaps??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd that Brussels was selected. Theres not that much in the way of transatlantic demand for that route from the USA anyway.</p>
<p>Geneva would have been a better option. I wonder if AF-KLM use AZ as their open skies pet project in response?</p>
<p>Lufthansa seems to be the red herring here - a move for Bishops bmi perhaps??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boeing Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2008/01/09/openskies/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Boeing Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=184#comment-679</guid>
		<description>To put it mildly, the abject omission will have pissed off the execs at AMR to the highest degree.

Quite extraordinary that this was not a collaborative venture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put it mildly, the abject omission will have pissed off the execs at AMR to the highest degree.</p>
<p>Quite extraordinary that this was not a collaborative venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
