<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 777-200F &#38; 747-8F - The World On Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keeping The (Freight) Faith - 777-200F &#38; 747-8F &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeping The (Freight) Faith - 777-200F &#38; 747-8F &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-495</guid>
		<description>[...] Speculation whirred amongst skeptics and analysts alike that there would be issues that could derail these two projects. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speculation whirred amongst skeptics and analysts alike that there would be issues that could derail these two projects. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boeing 787 First Flight To Be Pushed Back &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Boeing 787 First Flight To Be Pushed Back &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-492</guid>
		<description>[...] for a much greater window of flight tests and will not require the alleged extra resource from the 747-8F or 777-200F, the latter of which will be heading into production, testing and service entry during 2008. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a much greater window of flight tests and will not require the alleged extra resource from the 747-8F or 777-200F, the latter of which will be heading into production, testing and service entry during 2008. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keesje</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>keesje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-493</guid>
		<description>So one thing is for certain:  Boeing is on track until Boeing announces any firm schedule changes.
..
Maybe the best way is to not only repeat what Boeing says.

Of course a customer repeats what Boeing says. He has to legally. If he says he thinks it will be delayed he has weakened his negotiation position later on if he has to negotiate compensation.

We can all docile believe Boeing will deliver more then 100 787s in 2009, the 787-3, 772ER/LR and 747-8i will sell in healthy numbers, the A350XWB and cheap converted 744Fs flooding the market create no issue etc.  until Boeing says otherwise.

I  think that if you are responsible for making investment  choices &#38; and wrong choices cause personal financial damage everything changes..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So one thing is for certain:  Boeing is on track until Boeing announces any firm schedule changes.<br />
..<br />
Maybe the best way is to not only repeat what Boeing says.</p>
<p>Of course a customer repeats what Boeing says. He has to legally. If he says he thinks it will be delayed he has weakened his negotiation position later on if he has to negotiate compensation.</p>
<p>We can all docile believe Boeing will deliver more then 100 787s in 2009, the 787-3, 772ER/LR and 747-8i will sell in healthy numbers, the A350XWB and cheap converted 744Fs flooding the market create no issue etc.  until Boeing says otherwise.</p>
<p>I  think that if you are responsible for making investment  choices &amp; and wrong choices cause personal financial damage everything changes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Through The Looking Glass &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Through The Looking Glass &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-494</guid>
		<description>[...] As we peer through the looking glass into tomorrow, Boeing maintains that both of its large freighters are on track. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we peer through the looking glass into tomorrow, Boeing maintains that both of its large freighters are on track. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firmed Up &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Firmed Up &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-486</guid>
		<description>[...] only does this news dispel some of the rumors that the project is in jeopardy (for now at least), but will likely point the way for more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only does this news dispel some of the rumors that the project is in jeopardy (for now at least), but will likely point the way for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inspiring Confidence &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Inspiring Confidence &#171; BOEING777&#8217;s Editorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-490</guid>
		<description>[...] the 777-200F on track for a late 2008 service entry, the news for both it and the Dreamliner come at a time when skeptics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the 777-200F on track for a late 2008 service entry, the news for both it and the Dreamliner come at a time when skeptics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeing777</title>
		<link>http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/2007/11/02/777-200f-747-8f-the-world-on-time/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>boeing777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fleetbuzzeditorial.com/?p=139#comment-487</guid>
		<description>sonicruiserlives:

http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2007/10/a_change_of_flight_plan.html

Randy Tinseth stated the same thing until the news was released.

“It is still our objective to meet that May 2008 delivery but in doing that we have had to compress our flight-test schedule.”

I'm of the opinion I would rather wait to hear any news of delays from Boeing than on leaks or rumor.

It's often all to easy to post leaks and proprietary information without consent - and thats something I've neither engaged in or intend to do or use sources that are prepared to leak news for whatever agenda they have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonicruiserlives:</p>
<p><a href="http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2007/10/a_change_of_flight_plan.html" rel="nofollow">http://boeingblogs.com/randy/archives/2007/10/a_change_of_flight_plan.html</a></p>
<p>Randy Tinseth stated the same thing until the news was released.</p>
<p>“It is still our objective to meet that May 2008 delivery but in doing that we have had to compress our flight-test schedule.”</p>
<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion I would rather wait to hear any news of delays from Boeing than on leaks or rumor.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s often all to easy to post leaks and proprietary information without consent - and thats something I&#8217;ve neither engaged in or intend to do or use sources that are prepared to leak news for whatever agenda they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
